Latest Casting News in TV & Movies
facebook twitter Google+ YouTube RSS

‘Let The Right One In’ vs. ‘Let Me In’: Cast Comparison

Posted at March 14, 2012 by 3 Comments

'Let the Right One In' Swedish book cover

In 2008, director Tomas Alfredson brought Let The Right One In to life in John Ajvide Lindqvist tale of two young individuals in Stockholm: Oskar, a 12-year-old boy and Eli, a centuries-old vampire who strike an unlikely friendship. While 2 years later in 2010, Matt Reeves would bring the story to the Reagan-era of New Mexico, renaming the characters Owen and Abby in Let Me In. On the surface you would question the true nature of the story, but the essence lies in its altruistic need for a friend when surrounded by the negativity of man.

Dealing with fractured tales of pedophilia and school bullying, subject matter not easy to digest and depict on film, both films present the core relationship as honest and good-natured protection of one another. The different settings and particular subplots change the dynamic between all the characters and their story.

Oskar (Kare Hedebrant) vs. Owen (Kodi Smith-McPhee)

Both come from neglectful parents, who lack a presence (at times mentally or physically) leaves them to spend their time in the wasteland of the working class building projects. Oskar begins to define himself by retaliating against his bully through more violent means, while Owen is left more emotionally fractured and in desperate need of his own way out. Smith-McPhee plays up the more emotionally vulnerable (and open) aspects, while being physically lesser than his Swedish counterpart. Hedebrant feels more appropriately lost in the time of his present, wandering the unknown, defining himself by his need for revenge and ultimately finding a friend.

Eli (Lina Leandersson) vs. Abby (Chloe Grace Moretz)

The vampire aspect here gets played much differently from either adaptation. Eli is played in a more androgynous light, while Abby uses the presence of her female sexuality as a lure to her more creature-like appearance when lusting for blood. This is due to the subplot in the source novel that revealed Eli was castrated as a boy before being turned into a vampire, something hinted at in Alfredson’s adaptation and not in Reeves’. Leandersson plays Eli as a repulsive figure, one that no one could understandably care for because of her vampiric quality and yet, has her guardian and Oskar wanting to protect her vampiric identity. Moretz plays Abby as if longing for someone to care about her, someone not damaged by life-long sacrifices and seeking a more intimate relationship with her protector(s).

Hakan (Per Ragnar) vs. The Father (Richard Jenkins)

The Protector. The Father. The lover and the scorned individual, who sacrificed so much for the one they loved as a young child is the most tragic figure in the films. Played very differently and (dare I say) with deeper layers of physical and emotional toll by Richard Jenkins. Nothing against Ragnar, who brings forth believability in devoting one’s life to their childhood friendship/love, Jenkins adds layers of discontent and animosity not readily apparent with Ragnar’s performance. Jenkins’ sacrifice comes from hiding the shame of his decades-long murders and protecting Abby, while Ragnar’s is about a selfless sacrifice in protecting Eli above all else, a sort of declaration of his love towards her.

Both Alfredson and Reeves directed well defined versions of the novel by author John Ajvide Lindqvist that have different emotional and physical tones. What’s most apparent is that the narrative remains unchanged. The actors who portrayed these characters are simply telling the same story: the tale of two young individuals who seek a bond with one another that their life is missing. Nurtured through love and protection, a defining quality for any generation.

Movie News From Beyond!
Mario Melidona

About Mario Melidona

Mario has produced and written several screenplays and recently directed and edited a Black & White Short filmed on 16mm. His newfound love for postmodernism and the rise of existential cinema has been a great influence on his writings.

  • Dmann

    I would hardly say that Eli is repulsive

    I saw her more so as “Emotionally guarded and out of touch”…I saw a much kinder soul in Eli then I did with Abby…I saw someone who at the very least honored her Guardian’s wishes. One of my favourite moments in LTROI is after the “Please Don’t See that Boy” Scene where it shows Eli desperately wanting to talk to Oskar, however she withdraws because she does respect the wishes of Hakan…unlike Abby who couldn’t seem to give two *beep* that Thomas is out there killing for her in the same scene, instead she just smiles her head off at the thought of the little boy next door.

    I saw someone who showed remorse for her kill, unlike Abby who just runs away without thought. I don’t know, I always thought Eli was the kinder of the two

    I never saw her as repulsive…I just saw her as being completely out of touch emotionally, and that’s the thing that Oskar brings out in her.

  • Dmann

    Also its debateable in the original as to whether Hakan was a child hood friend or a recent friend she just picked up off the streets ;-)

    The child hood friend plot is THE plot of LMI

    In LTROI, it QUESTIONABLE as to whether they were Childhood friends or not. Personally I don’t think they were. After all Eli mentions something along the lines of “You said you would help me”. It implies that their relationship may be based on a deal of some sort (or granted it could be something he said to her when he was younger, it works both ways). The “Don’t see that boy” scene has always felt like a shady deal to me more so then anything out of actual affection. Also I find it funny that he longs for her attention and yet she never quite returns it…Look at the way they introduce the character at the beginning of the movie. He longingly looks at her and yet she never returns the look. Plus you have the indication of Hakan staring longingly at the young boys playing Basketball before he launches his attack on said boy

    Hakan’s true nature is questionable. Thomas’ backstory is confirmed, whilst Hakan’s remains questionable

  • Mmelidona

    This fact about Hakan being a childhood friend is not out rightly stated as in LMI with Jenkins characters and Abby. The sense of their relationship is more than stranger and obedience, its as if there’s a long history between the two. There’s something about the ambivalence that feeds layers of untold story, that it leaves Hakan a truly ambivalent character. One in which we do not emotionally attach ourselves. When we see this narrative play out in LMI, it comes as a surprise as well and we’re much more involved with The Father’s attack, using acid to hide his identity and his subsequent death at the hands of Abby.

    Eli wasn’t repulsive, but rather her true nature (being a vampire, cold and detached) was what Eli thinks repulses others when in fact its what draws Hakan and Oskar towards her. I think they both equally show remorse in a context appropriate of how they perceive themselves.